摘要
某矿山采用碱性氯化法对氰化尾浆进行处理,该法漂白粉耗量大且氰化物去除不稳定。本文根据该矿山的现场工艺,采用加压氧化车间产生的酸化溢流液对该矿山氰化尾浆进行预处理,并优化了初始pH、反应时间、药剂用量等参数条件。在酸化溢流液预处理pH=9,不额外补加铜离子,W(Na_2SO_3):W(CN_T)=8:1,反应时间60 min条件下,总氰和游离氰根的去除效果最好,总氰去除率为99.74%,游离氰根去除率为99.85%,处理后的废水含总氰0.28 mg/L,含游离氰根0. 14 mg/L,符合《黄金行业氰渣污染控制技术规范(HJ 943—2018)》要求,并且消耗了酸化溢流液,降低了酸化溢流液中和石灰成本,取得了良好的处理效果和经济效益。
A mine used alkaline chlorination to treat cyanide tailings. The method had large consumption of bleaching powder and unstable cyanide removal. According to the on-site process of the mine, the cyanide tailings of the mine were pretreated by the acidified overflow liquid proudced by the pressure oxidation workshop, and the parameters such as initial pH, reaction time, and dosage of the agent were optimized. Under the certain conditions, such as acidified overflow liquid pretreatment pH =9,no additional copper ions,W(Na_2SO_3): W(CN_T) = 8: I,reaction time 60 min, the removal of total cyanide and free cyanide was best. The total cyanide removal rate was 99. 74%,and the free cyanide removal rate was 99. 85%. The treated wastewater contained 0. 28 mg/L of total cyanide and0. 14 mg/L of free cyanide. The results were in line with the requirements of the Technical Specification for Cyanide Slag Pollution Control in the Gold Industry(HJ 943—2018). The treatment process consumed the acidified overflow liquid, reduced the cost of the acidified overflow liquid and the lime, and achieved good treatment effect and economic benefit.
引文
[1]耿明刚,周志明.含氰废水处理新进展[J].广东化工,2010,37(8):130-132.
[2]陈华进.高浓度含氰废水处理[D].南京:南京工业大学,2005.
[3]孙华林.废水中氰的处理技术进展[J].化工中间体,2002(6):23-25.
[4]顾桂松,胡湖生,杨明德.含氰废水的处理技术最近进展[J].环境保护,2001(2):16-19.
[5]梁达文.含氰废水处理方法评价[J].玉林师范学院学报,2004,25(3).48-52.
[6]台明青,唐红雨,李讳,等.金矿废水和尾矿中氰化物的处理研究进展[J].中国资源综合利用,2007,25(2):22-25.
[7] AKCIL A. Destruction of cyanide in gold mill effluents:biological versus chemical treatments[J]. Biotechnology Advances,2003,21(6):501-511.