汉中市古树名木科学文化价值额的计量分析
|
摘要
通过科学文化价值评估法对汉中市古树名木科学研究价值额、历史文化价值额与科学文化价值额进行统计,结果表明:该市古树名木科学研究价值额为75 162.16万元,历史文化价值额为19 594.83万元,科学文化价值总额约为94 756.99万元。从不同种类古树名木价值额来看,白皮松(Pinus bungeana)科学文化价值额和科学研究价值额最高,柏木(Cupressus funebris)历史文化价值额最高。从不同县区古树名木价值额来看,西乡县科学文化价值额和科学研究价值额最高,勉县的历史文化价值额最高。其结果旨在促进政府与民众对古树名木的重视与保护。
In this study, through scientific and cultural valuation method, the value of scientific research, historical culture, and scientific culture of ancient and famous trees in Hanzhong area were analyzed. The results showed that value of scientific research was 751.6216 million yuan, the historical culture value was 195.9483 million yuan, and the value of scientific culture was 947.5699 million yuan. Meanwhile,the value of different species ancient and famous trees showed that: Pinus bungeana had the highest scientific research value and scientific culture value, while Cupressus funebris had the highest historical culture value. The value of different counties ancient and famous trees showed that: Xixiang county had the highest scientific research value and scientific culture value, while Mian county had the highest historical culture value. The results aim to promote the government and people's attention and protection of ancient and famous trees.
In this study, through scientific and cultural valuation method, the value of scientific research, historical culture, and scientific culture of ancient and famous trees in Hanzhong area were analyzed. The results showed that value of scientific research was 751.6216 million yuan, the historical culture value was 195.9483 million yuan, and the value of scientific culture was 947.5699 million yuan. Meanwhile,the value of different species ancient and famous trees showed that: Pinus bungeana had the highest scientific research value and scientific culture value, while Cupressus funebris had the highest historical culture value. The value of different counties ancient and famous trees showed that: Xixiang county had the highest scientific research value and scientific culture value, while Mian county had the highest historical culture value. The results aim to promote the government and people's attention and protection of ancient and famous trees.
引文
[1]杨凌.北方部分地区古树名木复壮养护技术现状及保护对策研究[D].咸阳:西北农林科技大学,2015.
[2]董冬,周志翔,何云核,等.基于游客支付意愿的古树名木资源保护经济价值评估:以安徽省九华山风景区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(11):13 34-1340.
[3]胡月玲,郑淑颖,管东生,等.广州城市古树名木的评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2000(S2):45-47.
[4] GARRY M."The Burnley Method of Amenity Tree"Evaluation[J]. Australian Journal of Arboriculture, 1988,1(1):19-26
[5] FLOOK R. A standard method for treeevaluationSTEM[J].Journal of the Royal New Zealand, 1999,1(3):29
[6] HELLIWELL D R. The Amenity Value of Trees and Woodlands[J]. Arboricultural Association Journal, 1976,1(5):128-131.
[7]王继程.古树名木综合价值评价研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2011.
[8]林思平.古树名木资产评估研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2017.
[9]米锋,李吉,张大红,等.北京市林木额的价值计量研究:有关古树名木科学文化价值额计量方法的探讨[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,(S2):141-148.
[10]谢斌,郭俊荣,杨培华,等.陕西省银杏古树名木调查[J].西北林学院学报,2003,18(3):31-33.
[11]危锋,常庆瑞,郑顺安.汉中市退耕还林与可持续发展[J1.西北林学院学报,2006,21(4):13-17.
[12]崔高阳,陈云明,曹阳,等.陕西省森林生态系统碳储量分布格局分析[J].植物生态学报,2015,39(4):333-342.
[13]汉中市政府办.汉中市人民政府关于印发汉中市古树名木目录的通知[Z].2017-9-15.
[14]王晶晶,唐丽玉,林定,等.基于虚拟植物的古树名木三维管理信息系统的设计与实现[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(2):60-63+69.
[15]易绮斐,王发国,叶琦君,等.广州从化市古树名木资源调查初报[J].植物资源与环境学报,2011,20(1):69-73.
[16]中华人民共和国人民统计局.中国统计年鉴:2011[M].北京:中国统计,2011(11):2.
[17]中国珍稀濒危保护植物名录[J].生物学通报,1987(7):23-28.
[18]徐炜.古树名木价值评估标准的探讨[J].华南热带农业大学学报,2005,11(1):66-69.
[19]刘东明,王发国,陈红锋,等.香港古树名木的调查及保护问题[J].生态环境,2008,17(4):1560-1565.
[20]周海华,王双龙.我国古树名木资源法律保护探析[J].生态经济,2007(3):153-155.
[21] BECKER N, FREEMAN S. The economic value of old growth trees in Israel[J]. Forest Policy and Economics,2009,11(8):608-615.
[22] ADAMS C, MOTTA R S, ORTIZ R A, et al. The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world:Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, S o Paulo State(Brazil)[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 66(2):359-370.
[2]董冬,周志翔,何云核,等.基于游客支付意愿的古树名木资源保护经济价值评估:以安徽省九华山风景区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(11):13 34-1340.
[3]胡月玲,郑淑颖,管东生,等.广州城市古树名木的评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2000(S2):45-47.
[4] GARRY M."The Burnley Method of Amenity Tree"Evaluation[J]. Australian Journal of Arboriculture, 1988,1(1):19-26
[5] FLOOK R. A standard method for treeevaluationSTEM[J].Journal of the Royal New Zealand, 1999,1(3):29
[6] HELLIWELL D R. The Amenity Value of Trees and Woodlands[J]. Arboricultural Association Journal, 1976,1(5):128-131.
[7]王继程.古树名木综合价值评价研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2011.
[8]林思平.古树名木资产评估研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2017.
[9]米锋,李吉,张大红,等.北京市林木额的价值计量研究:有关古树名木科学文化价值额计量方法的探讨[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,(S2):141-148.
[10]谢斌,郭俊荣,杨培华,等.陕西省银杏古树名木调查[J].西北林学院学报,2003,18(3):31-33.
[11]危锋,常庆瑞,郑顺安.汉中市退耕还林与可持续发展[J1.西北林学院学报,2006,21(4):13-17.
[12]崔高阳,陈云明,曹阳,等.陕西省森林生态系统碳储量分布格局分析[J].植物生态学报,2015,39(4):333-342.
[13]汉中市政府办.汉中市人民政府关于印发汉中市古树名木目录的通知[Z].2017-9-15.
[14]王晶晶,唐丽玉,林定,等.基于虚拟植物的古树名木三维管理信息系统的设计与实现[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(2):60-63+69.
[15]易绮斐,王发国,叶琦君,等.广州从化市古树名木资源调查初报[J].植物资源与环境学报,2011,20(1):69-73.
[16]中华人民共和国人民统计局.中国统计年鉴:2011[M].北京:中国统计,2011(11):2.
[17]中国珍稀濒危保护植物名录[J].生物学通报,1987(7):23-28.
[18]徐炜.古树名木价值评估标准的探讨[J].华南热带农业大学学报,2005,11(1):66-69.
[19]刘东明,王发国,陈红锋,等.香港古树名木的调查及保护问题[J].生态环境,2008,17(4):1560-1565.
[20]周海华,王双龙.我国古树名木资源法律保护探析[J].生态经济,2007(3):153-155.
[21] BECKER N, FREEMAN S. The economic value of old growth trees in Israel[J]. Forest Policy and Economics,2009,11(8):608-615.
[22] ADAMS C, MOTTA R S, ORTIZ R A, et al. The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world:Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, S o Paulo State(Brazil)[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 66(2):359-370.