用户名: 密码: 验证码:
企业危机网络舆情的传播路径及其在供应链中的纵向溢出效应研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on the Diffusion Path and Vertical Spillover Effect in Supply Chains of Online Public Opinion after Firm Crisis
  • 作者:王筱纶 ; 顾洁
  • 英文作者:WANG Xiaolun;GU Jie;School of Economics & Management,Nanjing University of Science & Technology;Institute of Information,Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences;
  • 关键词:网络舆情 ; 危机管理 ; 溢出效应 ; 供应链 ; 新闻报道
  • 英文关键词:online public opinion;;crisis management;;spillover effect;;supply chain;;news report
  • 中文刊名:JCJJ
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Management Science
  • 机构:南京理工大学经济管理学院;上海社会科学院信息研究所;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-20
  • 出版单位:管理科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.32;No.181
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金(71802108,71702103);; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(30918013104);; 国家留学基金委员会资助(201808310040);; 南京理工大学经济管理学院青年教师基金(JGQN1802);南京理工大学科研启动项目~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JCJJ201901005
  • 页数:14
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:23-1510/C
  • 分类号:46-59
摘要
以微博、微信等为代表的社会化媒体为舆情传播提供了新的舞台,给企业危机管理和舆情应对带来深远影响。在人人皆是媒体的环境中,企业危机被新闻媒体曝光后迅速引发网络舆情在社交网站上的大规模传播和扩散,不仅给当事企业的声誉和业绩带来极其严重的负面影响,而且可能在进一步扩散过程中牵连供应链合作伙伴,发生纵向溢出效应。以刺激-认知-反应模型为理论框架,提出新闻报道→网络舆情→企业绩效的外部传导路径;基于激活扩散理论,结合供应链关系的内部中介路径,进一步阐述对危机企业供应链合作伙伴的纵向溢出效应的发生机理。针对危机企业在供应链中与终端客户的距离远近,提出该距离在纵向溢出过程中的调节作用。选择金融数据库、搜索引擎和社交网站等多个来源,收集涵盖71个危机事件和602个供应链对的二手面板数据,探索上述问题。研究结果表明,当危机事件曝光后,纵向相关企业(供应链合作伙伴)确实受纵向溢出效应的影响;在这一过程中,外部网络舆情起重要的传导和扩散作用,从新闻报道引发,并经由线上口碑的发酵和扩散,最终对危机企业的供应链合作伙伴发生纵向溢出效应;从内部企业影响看,危机事件对危机企业的冲击也会直接波及供应链企业,对其产生负面溢出影响。当危机企业与终端客户距离近时,网络舆情诱发更强的纵向溢出效应;当危机企业远离终端客户时,新闻媒体报道对纵向溢出效应的影响更为显著。对供应链纵向溢出效应的探索丰富了危机溢出理论,剖析了网络舆情在纵向溢出过程中的作用,阐述发生纵向溢出效应的情景,深化了对危机溢出发生机制的理解。从实践角度,为企业管理者应对危机和金融投资者的决策分析提供指导意见。
        Represented by Microblog and We Chat,social media have provided a new platform for the diffusion of online public opinion,and brought critical impact on firms' crisis management and response for public opinion. In the era of everyone is media,once firms' crisis event is exposed on news media,it will quickly trigger large-scale diffusion and spreading of online public opinion in social media. The negative impact may not only be limited to the focal firm,but can also extend to supply-chain partners,resulting in the vertical spillover effects.Based on the stimulus-organism-response model,this paper proposes the transmission path of news reports' online public opinion'stock-market performance. combing spreading activation theory with the internal intermediary path of supply chain relationship,this paper uncovers the mechanism underlying the vertical spillover effect on the supply chain partners of the firms in crisis. Besides,this paper proposes that when the distance between firms in crisis and end-consumers is different(far or near),moderating effect may exist during the vertical spillover process. To explore these research questions,this paper obtained data from multiple sources including financial databases,search engines and social networking sites,and finally collected second-hand panel data including 71 crisis events and 602 supply chain dyads.The results show that when crisis events are exposed,their vertical-related firms and supply chain partners are indeed affected by the vertical spillover effect. In this process,the external online public opinions play an important role in transmission and diffusion,which are triggered by news reports and eventually generate vertical spillover effect on supply chain partners of firms in crisis. From the influence of inter-firm relationship,the shock of crisis firm will also impact its supply chain partners directly,which leads to a negative spillover effect. In addition,when firms in crisis are near to end consumers,online public opinions will induce stronger vertical spillover effect. When firms in crisis are far from their consumers,the impact of news report on vertical spillover effect will be more significant.The findings of this paper further enrich the theory of crisis spillover effect in the direction of vertical spillover relationship,and it also analyzes the role of online public opinions in the vertical spillover process,and distinguishes different conditions of vertical spillover effect,thus deepens the understanding of the crisis spillover mechanism. From the practical perspective,it provides guidance for the crisis response strategies of firm managers and decision making of financial investors as well.
引文
[1]吴璇,田高良,司毅,等.网络舆情管理与股票流动性.管理科学,2017,30(6):51-64.WU Xuan,TIAN Gaoliang,SI Yi,et al. Internet media management and stock liquidity. Journal of Management Science,2017,30(6):51-64.(in Chinese)
    [2]徐彪,张媛媛,张珣.负面事件后消费者信任受损及其外溢机理研究.管理科学,2014,27(2):95-107.XU Biao,ZHANG Yuanyuan,ZHANG Xun. A study on mechanism of consumer trust damage and its spillover after negative events. Journal of Management Science,2014,27(2):95-107.(in Chinese)
    [3] PETROFF A,YAN S. China food scandal hits Mcdonald's,KFC(2014-7-21)[2017-10-21]. https:∥money. cnn.com/2014/07/21/news/companies/kfc-mcdonalds-china/.
    [4] AHLUWALIA R,UNNAVA H R,BURNKRANT R E. The moderating role of commitment on the spillover effect of marketing communications. Journal of Marketing Research,2001,38(4):458-470.
    [5] YU T Y,SENGUL M,LESTER R H. Misery loves company:the spread of negative impacts resulting from an organizational crisis. Academy of Management Review,2008,33(2):452-472.
    [6] GAO H Z,KNIGHT J G,ZHANG H X,et al. Guilt by association:heuristic risks for foreign brands during a productharm crisis in China. Journal of Business Research,2013,66(8):1044-1051.
    [7]段桂敏,余伟萍.副品牌伤害危机对主品牌评价影响研究:消费者负面情感的中介作用.华东经济管理,2012,26(4):115-119.DUAN Guimin,YU Weiping. Spillover of product crisis from subsidiary brand to main brand evaluation:the mediation role of consumer negative emotion. East China Economic Management,2012,26(4):115-119.(in Chinese)
    [8] ZOU P,LI G F. How emerging market investors'value competitors'customer equity:brand crisis spillover in China.Journal of Business Research,2016,69(9):3765-3771.
    [9]花海燕,伍勇强.产品伤害危机对竞争企业股票的溢出效应研究:品牌相似性和基金持股比例的作用.经营管理者,2015,3(9):1-3.HUA Haiyan,WU Yongqiang. The spillover effect of product harm crisis on competitive firms'stock performance:the effect of brand similarity and shareholding ratio. Manager'Journal,2015,3(9):1-3.(in Chinese)
    [10]程淼,何坪华.乳制品质量安全事件的溢出效应分析:以蒙牛食品危机事件为例.世界农业,2015(8):124-130.CHENG Miao,HE Pinghua. The spillover effect of quality safety accidents for dairy products:taking Mengniu food crisis as an example. World Agriculture,2015(8):124-130.(in Chinese)
    [11]汪峰.基于组织声誉修复的综合危机应对管理研究.合肥:中国科学技术大学,2013:51.WANG Feng. Comprehensive crisis response management based on organizational reputation restoration. Hefei:University of Science and Technology of China,2013:51.(in Chinese)
    [12] MEHRABIAN A,RUSSELL J A. An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge,MA:The MIT Press,1974:31.
    [13] HU X,HUANG Q,ZHONG X P,et al. The influence of peer characteristics and technical features of a social shopping website on a consumer's purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management,2016,36(6):1218-1230.
    [14] GAO H Z,KNIGHT J G,ZHANG H X,et al. Consumer scapegoating during a systemic product-harm crisis. Journal of Marketing Management,2012,28(11/12):1270-1290.
    [15] GOPINATH S,THOMAS J S,KRISHNAMURTHI L. Investigating the relationship between the content of online word of mouth,advertising,and brand performance. Marketing Science,2014,33(2):241-258.
    [16] BOLLEN J,MAO H,ZENG X J. Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science,2011,2(1):1-8.
    [17] COLLINS A M,LOFTUS E F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing∥Readings in Cognitive Science.London:Elsevier Inc,1988:126-136.
    [18]胡晓兰,肖科峰.论物流与人力流、信息流、资金流的整合优化.云南社会科学,2016,36(6):68-72.HU Xiaolan,XIAO Kefeng. On integrated optimization of material flow,human flow,information flow and capital flow.Social Sciences in Yunnan,2016,36(6):68-72.(in Chinese)
    [19]王禹杰,高雪垠.基于BIM的建筑供应链信息模型构建.社会科学前沿,2016,5(5):702-707.WANG Yujie,GAO Xueyin. Information model specification of construction supply chain based on BIM. Advances in Social Sciences,2016,5(5):702-707.(in Chinese)
    [20]FORRESTER J W. Industrial dynamics. Eastford:Martino Fine Books,2013:1037-1041.
    [21] HUO B F,HAN Z J,PRAJOGO D. Antecedents and consequences of supply chain information integration:a resourcebased view. Supply Chain Management,2016,21(6):661-677.
    [22] BOUTE R N,DISNEY S M,LAMBRECHT M R,et al. A win-win solution for the bullwhip problem. Production Planning&Control,2008,19(7):702-711.
    [23] KACHE F,SEURING S. Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of big data analytics and supply chain management. International Journal of Operations&Production Management,2017,37(1):10-36.
    [24] FANG L,PERESS J. Media coverage and the cross-section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance,2009,64(5):2023-2052.
    [25]王丽娜,马得勇.新媒体时代媒体的可信度分析:以中国网民为对象的实证研究.武汉大学学报(人文科学版),2016,69(1):88-99.WANG Lina,MA Deyong. The determinants of media credibility in the new media age:an empirical analysis of Chinese netizens. Wuhan University Journal(Humanity Sciences),2016,69(1):88-99.(in Chinese)
    [26]武慧锋.新闻报道对股票价格影响的实证研究.财政科学,2017,21(9):135-140.WU Huifeng. Empirical study on how news impact stock prices. Fiscal Science,2017,21(9):135-140.(in Chinese)
    [27] GILBERT T,KOGAN S,LOCHSTOER L,et al. Investor inattention and the market impact of summary statistics. Management Science,2012,58(2):336-350.
    [28] SCHUMAKER R P,CHEN H. Textual analysis of stock market prediction using breaking financial news:the AZFin text system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems,2009,27(2):1-29.
    [29]罗进辉,杜兴强.媒体报道、制度环境与股价崩盘风险.会计研究,2014(9):53-59.LUO Jinhui,DU Xingqiang. Media coverage,institutional environment and stock price crash. Accounting Research,2014(9):53-59.(in Chinese)
    [30] JONSSON S,GREVE H R,FUJIWARA-GREVE T. Undeserved loss:the spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Administrative Science Quarterly,2009,54(2):195-228.
    [31] HOLLEBEEK L D,GLYNN M S,BRODIE R J. Consumer brand engagement in social media:conceptualization,scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing,2014,28(2):149-165.
    [32] ROSARIO A B,SOTGIU F,DE VALCK K,et al. The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales:a meta-analytic review of platform,product,and metric factors. Journal of Marketing Research,2016,53(3):297-318.
    [33] LUO X M. Quantifying the long-term impact of negative word of mouth on cash flows and stock prices. Marketing Science,2009,28(1):148-165.
    [34] MAO H N,COUNTS S,BOLLEN J. Computational economic and finance gauges:polls,search,&Twitter. Stanford,CT:The National Bureau of Economic Research,2011.
    [35] FOSU S,DANSO A,AHMAD W,et al. Information asymmetry,leverage and firm value:do crisis and growth matter?.International Review of Financial Analysis,2016,46:140-150.
    [36]李想,石磊.行业信任危机的一个经济学解释:以食品安全为例.经济研究,2014,49(1):169-181.LI Xiang,SHI Lei. An economics explanation for the crisis of trust in food industry. Economic Research Journal,2014,49(1):169-181.(in Chinese)
    [37]丁慧,吕长江,黄海杰.社交媒体、投资者信息获取和解读能力与盈余预期:来自“上证e互动”平台的证据.经济研究,2018,53(1):153-168.DING Hui,LYU Changjiang,HUANG Haijie. Social media,investor sophistication and earning expectation:evidence from SSE E-Interaction. Economic Research Journal,2018,53(1):153-168.(in Chinese)
    [38]刘璇,汪林威,李嘉,等.在线健康社区中用户回帖行为影响机理研究.管理科学,2017,30(1):62-72.LIU Xuan,WANG Linwei,LI Jia,et al. Research on mechanisms of user replying behaviors in online health communities. Journal of Management Science,2017,30(1):62-72.(in Chinese)
    [39] KANG M. Measuring social media credibility:a study on a measure of blog credibility∥The Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association. Boston,MA,2010:59-68.
    [40]卢继周,冯耕中,王能民,等.信息共享下库存量牛鞭效应的影响因素研究.管理科学学报,2017,20(3):137-148.LU Jizhou,FENG Gengzhong,WANG Nengmin,et al. Factors affecting bullwhip effect of inventory under information sharing. Journal of Management Sciences in China,2017,20(3):137-148.(in Chinese)
    [41]王清晓.契约与关系共同治理的供应链知识协同机制.科学学研究,2016,34(10):1532-1540.WANG Qingxiao. Mechanism of knowledge collaboration in supply chain based on contractual and relational governance.Studies in Science of Science,2016,34(10):1532-1540.(in Chinese)
    [42]刘永胜,王荷丽,徐广姝.食品供应链安全风险博弈分析.经济问题,2018(1):57-64,90.LIU Yongsheng,WANG Heli,XU Guangshu. Game analysis of safety risk in food supply chain. On Economic Problems,2018(1):57-64,90.(in Chinese)
    [43]覃楚涵.社交媒体与新闻网站对突发性事件的信息传播比较:以微博、人民网对“天津滨海爆炸”事故的报道为例.新闻研究导刊,2016,7(6):59-60.QIN Chuhan. Comparison of information transmission on crisis between social media and news websites:a case study of“explosion in Binhai,Tianjin” reported by microblog and People's Daily. Journal of News Research,2016,7(6):59-60.(in Chinese)
    [44]李阳.企业网络舆情再传播意愿研究.哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2013:24-26.LI Yang. The research on the rediffusion intention of the enterprise network public opinion. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology,2013:24-26.(in Chinese)
    [45] BROWN S J,WARNER J B. Using daily stock returns:the case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics,1985,14(1):3-31.
    [46]吕雄伟,张红历,李军,等.基于多因子回归模型的投资者情绪与异常收益率的实证研究.当代经济,2016(29):87-89.LYU Xiongwei,ZHANG Hongli,LI Jun,et al. Empirical research on investor emotions and abnormal returns based on multiple factor regression model. Contemporary Economics,2016(29):87-89.(in Chinese)
    [47] XU S X,ZHANG X Q. Impact of wikipedia on market information environment:evidence on management disclosure and investor reaction. MIS Quarterly,2013,37(4):1043-1068.
    [48] LUO X M,ZHANG J,DUAN W J. Social media and firm equity value. Information Systems Research,2013,24(1):146-163.
    [49]白仲林.面板数据的计量经济分析.天津:南开大学出版社,2008:212-220.BAI Zhonglin. Econometric analysis of panel data. Tianjin:Nankai University Press,2008:212-220.(in Chinese)
    [50] BARON R M,KENNY D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,51(6):1173-1182.
    [51] WANG X L,HONG Z J,XU Y J,et al. Relevance judgments of mobile commercial information. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(7):1335-1348.
    [52]徐云杰.社会调查设计与数据分析:从立题到发表.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2011:150-153.XU Yunjie. Social investigation design and data analysis.Chongqing:Chongqing University Press,2011:150-153.(in Chinese)
    [53] PREACHER K J,HAYES A F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods,Instruments,&Computers,2004,36(4):717-731.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700