四川省行业性专业性人民调解组织建设实证研究
|
摘要
科技与经济社会发展决定了行业性、专业性矛盾纠纷呈持续、长久攀升态势,加强行业性、专业性人民调解组织建设势在必行。目前,四川省严格遵循行业性专业性人民调解组织的按需组建原则,组织数量、办案数量均呈增长态势,组织设立、业务受司法行政部门指导,办公选址既方便群众又符合中立要求,值得肯定。但是,四川省行业性专业性人民调解组织的发起设立主体主要是当地政府部门,组织成员多数由政府公职人员担任,体现出明显的行政化倾向,不符合人民调解的本质属性要求,这种状况与当初全国工作方向不明背景下司法行政部门给予的指导有着内在关系。行业性与专业性人民调解组织职能有别,应当分而治之,四川行业性人民调解组织应当依托行业协会推选组建,专业性人民调解组织应当依托人民调解员协会物色公示人选、经过人民群众提异议的程序方式组建。
The development of technology economy, and society have led to the increase of disputes with industrial or professional characteristics, which makes it imperative to strengthen the organizational construction of industry-based and professional people's mediation. At present, Sichuan province strictly follows the principle of "construction ondemand" in constructing people's mediation organizations. The number of organizations and cases handled are increasing. Both the establishment of people's mediation organizations and their operation are guided by the judicial administrative departments. Mediation organizations are located in neutral sites convenient for the public. However,the main bodies initiating the establishment of people's mediation organizations in Sichuan Province is mainly the local government departments. Most of the people's mediation members of the organizations are government employees, which manifest obvious administrative tendency and does not meet the essential attribute requirements of people's mediation. These are the results of the unclear guidance given by the judicial administrative department across the country. Industrial and professional people's mediation organizations have different functions and should be organized accordingly. The industry-based people's mediation organizations in Sichuan should rely on the industry associations, while the professional mediation organizations should rely on the people's mediators committee and the public.
The development of technology economy, and society have led to the increase of disputes with industrial or professional characteristics, which makes it imperative to strengthen the organizational construction of industry-based and professional people's mediation. At present, Sichuan province strictly follows the principle of "construction ondemand" in constructing people's mediation organizations. The number of organizations and cases handled are increasing. Both the establishment of people's mediation organizations and their operation are guided by the judicial administrative departments. Mediation organizations are located in neutral sites convenient for the public. However,the main bodies initiating the establishment of people's mediation organizations in Sichuan Province is mainly the local government departments. Most of the people's mediation members of the organizations are government employees, which manifest obvious administrative tendency and does not meet the essential attribute requirements of people's mediation. These are the results of the unclear guidance given by the judicial administrative department across the country. Industrial and professional people's mediation organizations have different functions and should be organized accordingly. The industry-based people's mediation organizations in Sichuan should rely on the industry associations, while the professional mediation organizations should rely on the people's mediators committee and the public.
引文
[1]徐昕.调解:中国与世界[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2013.
[2]内蒙古自治区司法厅课题组.行业性专业性人民调解工作的实践与思考[J],中国司法,2016(12):22-27.
[3]杨宜勇,曾志敏.社会治理现代化的政策设计:着眼“十三五”[J].改革,2016(8):98-111.
[4]范愉.《中华人民共和国人民调解法》评析[J].法学家,2011(2):1-12.
[5]司法部基层工作指导司.全国行业、专业性人民调解工作文件汇编之一:下册[M].北京:法律出版社,2016:671.
[6]何永军.乡村社会嬗变与人民调解制度变迁[J].法制与社会发展,2013(1):76-90.
[7]张军.进一步加强新形势下人民调解工作[J].人民调解,2017(8):14-20.
[8]周望.转型中的人民调解:三个悖论——兼评《人民调解法》[J].社会科学,2011(10):100-106.
(1)目前官方与学界对“行业性、专业性人民调解组织”未曾作出界分。本文为研究行业性专业性人民调解组织的具体组建主体与程序问题有必要将其作出界分,而且是将旅游调解组织、茶行业调解组织等界分为行业性人民调解组织,将医调、交调、环调、拆调、物调、婚调等人民调解组织界分为专业性人民调解组织。
(1)数据来源于四川省司法厅基层处统计资料。
(2)数据来源于四川省司法厅基层处统计资料。
(1)特别是组建人民调解委员会联合会的广安模式,受到司法行政部门与中外学界高度关注,提供了生动的人民调解协会组织建设实践经验与丰富的理论内涵。
[2]内蒙古自治区司法厅课题组.行业性专业性人民调解工作的实践与思考[J],中国司法,2016(12):22-27.
[3]杨宜勇,曾志敏.社会治理现代化的政策设计:着眼“十三五”[J].改革,2016(8):98-111.
[4]范愉.《中华人民共和国人民调解法》评析[J].法学家,2011(2):1-12.
[5]司法部基层工作指导司.全国行业、专业性人民调解工作文件汇编之一:下册[M].北京:法律出版社,2016:671.
[6]何永军.乡村社会嬗变与人民调解制度变迁[J].法制与社会发展,2013(1):76-90.
[7]张军.进一步加强新形势下人民调解工作[J].人民调解,2017(8):14-20.
[8]周望.转型中的人民调解:三个悖论——兼评《人民调解法》[J].社会科学,2011(10):100-106.
(1)目前官方与学界对“行业性、专业性人民调解组织”未曾作出界分。本文为研究行业性专业性人民调解组织的具体组建主体与程序问题有必要将其作出界分,而且是将旅游调解组织、茶行业调解组织等界分为行业性人民调解组织,将医调、交调、环调、拆调、物调、婚调等人民调解组织界分为专业性人民调解组织。
(1)数据来源于四川省司法厅基层处统计资料。
(2)数据来源于四川省司法厅基层处统计资料。
(1)特别是组建人民调解委员会联合会的广安模式,受到司法行政部门与中外学界高度关注,提供了生动的人民调解协会组织建设实践经验与丰富的理论内涵。