代位诉讼的法律结构重塑与既判力研究
|
摘要
合同法第73条第一款规定:"因债务人怠于行使其到期债权,对债务人造成损害的,债权人可以向人民法院请求以自己的名义代位行使债务人的债权,但该债权专属于债务人自身的除外。"这一法律条文确立了代位诉讼制度。作为一种新型的诉讼制度,代位诉讼在对债权人的合法权益进行充分周全保障的同时,也面临许多含混不清而又无法回避的问题,这些问题的厘清与破解对于完善合同法理论和促进代位诉讼司法实践具有现实指导价值。
Article73 of the Contract Law, the first paragraph, stipulates: "if a debtor loses interest in exercising his due claim and causes damage to the debtor, the creditor can ask the people's court to subrogate the debtor's creditor's rights in his own name, but the creditor's right belongs exclusively to the debtor himself." This legal provision establishes a subrogation system in a narrow sense, that is, the system of subrogation. As a new type of lawsuit system, subrogation litigation fully comprehensive insurance at the same time in the creditor's legitimate rights and interests, is also facing many vague and inevitable problems, these problems and clarify the crack for perfecting the theory of contract law and has practical value and promote the practice of subrogation litigation law.Therefore, proceeding from the basic principles of civil lawsuits in continental law system, it is very necessary and meaningful to conduct in-depth and detailed analysis and response to relevant issues of subrogation.
Article73 of the Contract Law, the first paragraph, stipulates: "if a debtor loses interest in exercising his due claim and causes damage to the debtor, the creditor can ask the people's court to subrogate the debtor's creditor's rights in his own name, but the creditor's right belongs exclusively to the debtor himself." This legal provision establishes a subrogation system in a narrow sense, that is, the system of subrogation. As a new type of lawsuit system, subrogation litigation fully comprehensive insurance at the same time in the creditor's legitimate rights and interests, is also facing many vague and inevitable problems, these problems and clarify the crack for perfecting the theory of contract law and has practical value and promote the practice of subrogation litigation law.Therefore, proceeding from the basic principles of civil lawsuits in continental law system, it is very necessary and meaningful to conduct in-depth and detailed analysis and response to relevant issues of subrogation.
引文
[1]王峰.我国债权人代位诉讼的理论依据[J].长春理工大学学报:社会科学版,2013(02).
[2]陈骏.被执行人在申请执行人代位析产诉讼中属于无独立请求权第三人[J].人民司法,2014(10).
[3]迟新伟.代位请求权在民事诉讼中的适用[J].法制博览,2016(02).
[4]项斌斌.代位执行与债权人代位权的立法冲突及其解决[J].私法研究,2016(06).
[5]任悦.次债务未确定不影响代位权的行使[J].人民司法,2017(02).
[6]曹晟鑫.论代位求偿权的法律限制[D].北方工业大学,2018.
(1)王利明、崔建远.合同法新论总则[M],中国政法大学出版社1999年版,第400-401页.
(2)陈刚.比较民事诉讼法(第一卷)[M],中国法制出版社,第188页.
(3)陈刚.比较民事诉讼法(第一卷)[M],中国法制出版社,第204页.
(4)[日]中村英郎.新民事诉讼法讲义[M],陈刚、林剑锋、郭美松译,法律出版社,第86-87页.
(5)高建飞.如何确定被代位人的诉讼地位[J],律师世界,2000(02):第18页.
(6)陈荣宗、林庆苗.民事诉讼法[M],台北三民书局,第229页.
(7)奥特马·尧厄尼希.民事诉讼法[M],周翠译,法律出版社,第429页.
(8)江伟.民事诉讼法学原理[M],中国人民大学出版社,第437-441页.
(9)江伟.民事诉讼法学原理[M],中国人民大学出版社,第239页.
(10)王锡山.民事诉讼法研究[M],重庆出版社,第109-110页.
(11)[日]三月章.日本民事诉讼法[M],汪一凡译,五南图书出版公司,第109-110页.
(12)江伟、邵明、陈刚.民事诉权研究[M],法律出版社,第178-179页.
(13)江伟、邵明、陈刚.民事诉权研究[M],法律出版社,第199页.
(14)江伟、邵明、陈刚.民事诉权研究[M],法律出版社,第201-202页.
(15)[日]小岛武司.现代型诉讼的意义、性质和特点[J],西南政法大学学报,1999(01):第21页.
(16)赵钢、刘学在.论代位权诉讼[J],法学研究,2000(06):第16页.
(17)江伟.民事诉讼法学原理[M],中国人民大学出版社,第216-220页.
(18)[日]兼子一、竹下守夫.民事诉讼法[M],白绿铉译,法律出版社,第75页.
(19)江伟.民事诉讼法学原理[M],中国人民大学出版社,第174页.
(20)王亚新.对抗与判定[M],清华大学出版社,第338页.
[2]陈骏.被执行人在申请执行人代位析产诉讼中属于无独立请求权第三人[J].人民司法,2014(10).
[3]迟新伟.代位请求权在民事诉讼中的适用[J].法制博览,2016(02).
[4]项斌斌.代位执行与债权人代位权的立法冲突及其解决[J].私法研究,2016(06).
[5]任悦.次债务未确定不影响代位权的行使[J].人民司法,2017(02).
[6]曹晟鑫.论代位求偿权的法律限制[D].北方工业大学,2018.
(1)王利明、崔建远.合同法新论总则[M],中国政法大学出版社1999年版,第400-401页.
(2)陈刚.比较民事诉讼法(第一卷)[M],中国法制出版社,第188页.
(3)陈刚.比较民事诉讼法(第一卷)[M],中国法制出版社,第204页.
(4)[日]中村英郎.新民事诉讼法讲义[M],陈刚、林剑锋、郭美松译,法律出版社,第86-87页.
(5)高建飞.如何确定被代位人的诉讼地位[J],律师世界,2000(02):第18页.
(6)陈荣宗、林庆苗.民事诉讼法[M],台北三民书局,第229页.
(7)奥特马·尧厄尼希.民事诉讼法[M],周翠译,法律出版社,第429页.
(8)江伟.民事诉讼法学原理[M],中国人民大学出版社,第437-441页.
(9)江伟.民事诉讼法学原理[M],中国人民大学出版社,第239页.
(10)王锡山.民事诉讼法研究[M],重庆出版社,第109-110页.
(11)[日]三月章.日本民事诉讼法[M],汪一凡译,五南图书出版公司,第109-110页.
(12)江伟、邵明、陈刚.民事诉权研究[M],法律出版社,第178-179页.
(13)江伟、邵明、陈刚.民事诉权研究[M],法律出版社,第199页.
(14)江伟、邵明、陈刚.民事诉权研究[M],法律出版社,第201-202页.
(15)[日]小岛武司.现代型诉讼的意义、性质和特点[J],西南政法大学学报,1999(01):第21页.
(16)赵钢、刘学在.论代位权诉讼[J],法学研究,2000(06):第16页.
(17)江伟.民事诉讼法学原理[M],中国人民大学出版社,第216-220页.
(18)[日]兼子一、竹下守夫.民事诉讼法[M],白绿铉译,法律出版社,第75页.
(19)江伟.民事诉讼法学原理[M],中国人民大学出版社,第174页.
(20)王亚新.对抗与判定[M],清华大学出版社,第338页.