技术创新、制度创新与中部地区产业转型升级效率分析
|
摘要
本文基于工业化中期的视角,采用2008—2016年中部六省的面板数据,检验技术创新和制度创新与中部地区产业转型升级的相关性,并运用三阶段DEA模型对剔除了环境变量和随机干扰影响的产业转型升级效率进行比较分析。结果表明,技术创新和制度创新对中部地区产业转型升级均有显著的正向影响,制度创新在产业转型升级进程中的作用大于技术创新的作用。创新对中部地区产业转型升级的效率整体没有达到最优水平,主要是由规模效率较低导致,应当扩大创新活动规模,增加创新政策供给。制约产业转型升级效率的因素在各个省份之间具有差异性,各地应当依靠自身区位优势选择效率提升路径。
This paper based on the perspective of the intermediate stage of industrialization, employs panel data of six central provinces from 2008 to 2016, to examine the correlation between technological and institutional innovation and industrial transformation as well as upgrading in the central region. In addition, the three-stage DEA model is employed to compare and analyze the efficiency of industrial transformation and upgrading without the affect of the environmental variables and random interference. The finding indicates that technological and institutional innovation have an important positive influence on the industrial transformation and upgrading in the central region, while the role of institutional innovation during industrial transformation and upgrading is far great than technological innovation. The ensemble efficiency of innovation in the industrial transformation and upgrading has not reached the optimal level, which is mainly caused by the low scale efficiency. It should expand the scale of innovation activities and increase the supply of innovation policies. And the factors that restrict efficiency are so various among different provinces that all regions should rely on their own regional advantages to choose the path to improve efficiency.
This paper based on the perspective of the intermediate stage of industrialization, employs panel data of six central provinces from 2008 to 2016, to examine the correlation between technological and institutional innovation and industrial transformation as well as upgrading in the central region. In addition, the three-stage DEA model is employed to compare and analyze the efficiency of industrial transformation and upgrading without the affect of the environmental variables and random interference. The finding indicates that technological and institutional innovation have an important positive influence on the industrial transformation and upgrading in the central region, while the role of institutional innovation during industrial transformation and upgrading is far great than technological innovation. The ensemble efficiency of innovation in the industrial transformation and upgrading has not reached the optimal level, which is mainly caused by the low scale efficiency. It should expand the scale of innovation activities and increase the supply of innovation policies. And the factors that restrict efficiency are so various among different provinces that all regions should rely on their own regional advantages to choose the path to improve efficiency.
引文
[1]王海燕,郑秀梅.创新驱动发展的理论基础、内涵与评价[J].中国软科学,2017(1):41-49.
[2]潘宏亮.创新驱动引领产业转型升级的路径与对策 [J].经济纵横,2015(7):40-43.
[3]吕薇,马名杰,戴建军等.转型期我国创新发展的现状、问题及政策建议[J].中国软科学,2018(3):10-17.
[4]周叔莲,王伟光.科技创新与产业结构优化升级[J].管理世界,2001(5):12-26.
[5]章仁俊.创新与产业结构升级[J].经济管理,2001(17):19-21.
[6]孔曙光,陈玉川.广义技术创新与区域产业转型升级的机制探索[J].工业技术经济,2008(9):67-70.
[7]张银银,黄彬.创新驱动产业转型升级的路径研究[J].经济问题探索,2015(3):107-112.
[8]屠年松,李彦.创新驱动产业转型升级研究——基于2002-2013年省际面板数据[J].科技进步与对策,2015(24):50-55.
[9]周忠民.湖南省科技创新对产业转型升级的影响[J].经济地理,2016(5):115-120.
[10]金福子,刘洋.制度创新对产业转型升级影响的区域性差异[J].北京工业大学学报,2017(5):43-49.
[11]付宏,毛蕴诗等.创新对产业结构高级化影响的实证研究——基于2000——2011年的省际面板数据[J].中国工业经济,2013(9):56-68.
[12]白极星,周京奎.研发集聚创新能力与产业转型升级—基于工业企业数据实证研究[J].科学决策,2017(1):1-17.
[13]周小亮,李婷.技术创新与制度创新协同演化下促进经济增长的条件研究[J].东南学术,2017(1):189-197.
[14]于惊涛,杨大力.政府投入、经济自由度与创新效率:来自 24 个领先国家的实证经验[J].中国软科学,2018(7).181-192.
[15]费洪平.当前我国产业转型升级的方向及路径[J].宏观经济研究,2017(2):3-8.
[16] Fried H O,Lovell C A K,Schmidt S S,et al.Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopement Analysis [J].Journal of Produnctivity Analysis,2002(17):157-174.
[17]陈巍巍,张雷,马铁虎等.关于三阶段DEA模型的几点研究[J].系统工程,2014(9):144-149.
[18]刘广斌,李建坤.基于三阶段DEA模型的我国科普投入产出效率研究[J].中国软科学,2017(5):139-148.
[19]王业强,郭叶波,赵勇等.科技创新驱动区域协调发展:理论基础与中国实践[J].中国软科学,2017(11):86-100.
[2]潘宏亮.创新驱动引领产业转型升级的路径与对策 [J].经济纵横,2015(7):40-43.
[3]吕薇,马名杰,戴建军等.转型期我国创新发展的现状、问题及政策建议[J].中国软科学,2018(3):10-17.
[4]周叔莲,王伟光.科技创新与产业结构优化升级[J].管理世界,2001(5):12-26.
[5]章仁俊.创新与产业结构升级[J].经济管理,2001(17):19-21.
[6]孔曙光,陈玉川.广义技术创新与区域产业转型升级的机制探索[J].工业技术经济,2008(9):67-70.
[7]张银银,黄彬.创新驱动产业转型升级的路径研究[J].经济问题探索,2015(3):107-112.
[8]屠年松,李彦.创新驱动产业转型升级研究——基于2002-2013年省际面板数据[J].科技进步与对策,2015(24):50-55.
[9]周忠民.湖南省科技创新对产业转型升级的影响[J].经济地理,2016(5):115-120.
[10]金福子,刘洋.制度创新对产业转型升级影响的区域性差异[J].北京工业大学学报,2017(5):43-49.
[11]付宏,毛蕴诗等.创新对产业结构高级化影响的实证研究——基于2000——2011年的省际面板数据[J].中国工业经济,2013(9):56-68.
[12]白极星,周京奎.研发集聚创新能力与产业转型升级—基于工业企业数据实证研究[J].科学决策,2017(1):1-17.
[13]周小亮,李婷.技术创新与制度创新协同演化下促进经济增长的条件研究[J].东南学术,2017(1):189-197.
[14]于惊涛,杨大力.政府投入、经济自由度与创新效率:来自 24 个领先国家的实证经验[J].中国软科学,2018(7).181-192.
[15]费洪平.当前我国产业转型升级的方向及路径[J].宏观经济研究,2017(2):3-8.
[16] Fried H O,Lovell C A K,Schmidt S S,et al.Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopement Analysis [J].Journal of Produnctivity Analysis,2002(17):157-174.
[17]陈巍巍,张雷,马铁虎等.关于三阶段DEA模型的几点研究[J].系统工程,2014(9):144-149.
[18]刘广斌,李建坤.基于三阶段DEA模型的我国科普投入产出效率研究[J].中国软科学,2017(5):139-148.
[19]王业强,郭叶波,赵勇等.科技创新驱动区域协调发展:理论基础与中国实践[J].中国软科学,2017(11):86-100.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |