旅游发展效率与强度的时空耦合演变研究——以云南省为例
|
摘要
以云南省16个州市为研究单元,综合运用DEA模型、熵值赋权法、旅游发展强度指数及耦合协调模型,对2006—2016年云南省旅游发展效率与强度的耦合协调关系进行分析。研究发现:(1)2006—2016年,云南省各州市旅游发展综合效率、纯技术效率、规模效率变化均呈现出先增长后稳定的特点,规模效率的提升是促进综合效率增加的主要因素;(2)云南省旅游发展强度主体发展类型为上升型,旅游产业发展逐步由区域非均衡状态转向相对均衡状态,逐渐形成了以昆明为核心的"核心—边缘"式空间结构;(3)云南省旅游发展效率与强度的协调发展程度持续提升,区域耦合协调的"极化效应"逐步减弱,其空间分布格局也由以昆明为核心的"单极核心"空间布局向以昆明、丽江为核心的"双极核心"空间布局转变。
Taking 16 states and cities in Yunnan as the research unit,comprehensive use of DEA model,entropy weighting method,tourism development intensity index and coupling coordination model,the coupling and coordination relationship between the efficiency and intensity of tourism development in Yunnan Province from 2006 to 2016 was analyzed.The research found that:(1) From 2006 to 2016,the comprehensive efficiency,pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency of tourism development in various states and cities in Yunnan Province showed the characteristics of growth and stability first,and the improvement of scale efficiency was the main factor to promote the increase of comprehensive efficiency;(2) The main development type of tourism development intensity in Yunnan Province is a rising type,and the development of tourism industry gradually shifts from regional non-equilibrium state to relatively balanced state,gradually forming a "coreedge" spatial structure with Kunming as the core;(3) The coordinated development of tourism development efficiency and intensity in Yunnan Province has continued to increase,and the "polarization effect" of regional coupling and coordination has gradually weakened.The spatial distribution pattern is also from Kunming's "unipolar core" spatial layout to Kunming.Lijiang is the core "dipolar core" spatial layout transformation.
Taking 16 states and cities in Yunnan as the research unit,comprehensive use of DEA model,entropy weighting method,tourism development intensity index and coupling coordination model,the coupling and coordination relationship between the efficiency and intensity of tourism development in Yunnan Province from 2006 to 2016 was analyzed.The research found that:(1) From 2006 to 2016,the comprehensive efficiency,pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency of tourism development in various states and cities in Yunnan Province showed the characteristics of growth and stability first,and the improvement of scale efficiency was the main factor to promote the increase of comprehensive efficiency;(2) The main development type of tourism development intensity in Yunnan Province is a rising type,and the development of tourism industry gradually shifts from regional non-equilibrium state to relatively balanced state,gradually forming a "coreedge" spatial structure with Kunming as the core;(3) The coordinated development of tourism development efficiency and intensity in Yunnan Province has continued to increase,and the "polarization effect" of regional coupling and coordination has gradually weakened.The spatial distribution pattern is also from Kunming's "unipolar core" spatial layout to Kunming.Lijiang is the core "dipolar core" spatial layout transformation.
引文
[1]秦伟山,张义丰,李世泰.中国东部沿海城市旅游发展的时空演变[J].地理研究,2014(10):1956-1965.
[2]陆保一,明庆忠,郭向阳,等.云南省旅游产业与生态文明建设耦合协调度时空差异研究[J].资源开发与市场,2018(3):391-396.
[3]Morey R C,Dittmin D A.Evaluating a hotel GM's performance:A case in benchmarking[J].Cornell Hotel Restaurant and Administration Quarterly,2003,44(5-6):30-35.
[4]涂玮,黄震方,方叶林,等.入境旅游发展效率时空格局演化及驱动因素--以浙江为例[J].华东经济管理,2013(12):14-20.
[5]何昭丽,孙慧,张振龙.中国入境旅游发展效率及其影响因素研究[J].干旱区地理,2017(6):1282-1289.
[6]李亮,赵磊.中国旅游发展效率及其影响因素的实证研究--基于随机前沿分析方法(SFA)[J].经济管理,2013(2):124-134.
[7]Assaf A G.Benchmarking the Asia Pacific tourism industry:A Bayesian combination of DEA and stochastic frontier[J].Tourism Management,2012,33(5):1122-1127.
[8]Tsaur S H.The operating efficiency of inbound tourist hotels in Taiwan[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research,2000,6(1):29-37.
[9]Liu Y D.Profitability measurement of UK theme parks:An aggregate approach[J].Inbound Journal of Tourism Research,2008,10(3):283-288.
[10]Barros C P.Evaluating the efficiency of a small hotel chain with a Malmquist productivity index[J].International Journal of Tourism Research,2005,7(3):173-184.
[11]Ng C K,Seabright P.Competition,privatization and productive efficiency:Evidence from the airline industry[J].The Economic Journal,2001,111(143):591-619.
[12]李瑞,郭谦,贺跻,等.环渤海地区城市旅游业发展效率时空特征及其演化阶段--以三大城市群为例[J].地理科学进展,2014(6):773-785.
[13]朱磊,胡静,周葆华,等.中国省域森林公园旅游发展效率测度及其时空格局演化[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017(12):2003-2011.
[14]马晓龙,保继刚.基于DEA的中国国家级风景名胜区使用效率评价[J].地理研究,2009(3):838-848.
[15]陈浩,陆林,郑嬗婷.珠江三角洲城市群旅游空间格局演化[J].地理学报,2011(10):1427-1437.
[16]郭向阳,穆学青,明庆忠.旅游发展效率与旅游发展强度的时空耦合演变研究--以长江经济带为例[J].云南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017(6):65-75.
[17]宋鸿,陈晓玲.运用空间自相关分析中国入境旅游增长空间格局[J].世界地理研究,2006(1):99-106.
[18]覃成林,郑云峰,张华.我国区域经济协调发展的趋势及特征分析[J].经济地理,2013(1):9-14.
[19]彭邦文,武友德,曹洪华,等.基于系统耦合的旅游业与新型城镇化协调发展研究--以云南省为例[J].世界地理研究,2016(2):103-114.
[20]张淼丰.知识经济的可持续发展涵义[J].理论导刊,2000(3):24-26.
[21]曹芳东,黄震方,吴江,等.城市旅游发展效率的时空格局演化特征及其驱动机制--以泛长江三角洲地区为例[J].地理研究,2012(8):1431-1444.
[2]陆保一,明庆忠,郭向阳,等.云南省旅游产业与生态文明建设耦合协调度时空差异研究[J].资源开发与市场,2018(3):391-396.
[3]Morey R C,Dittmin D A.Evaluating a hotel GM's performance:A case in benchmarking[J].Cornell Hotel Restaurant and Administration Quarterly,2003,44(5-6):30-35.
[4]涂玮,黄震方,方叶林,等.入境旅游发展效率时空格局演化及驱动因素--以浙江为例[J].华东经济管理,2013(12):14-20.
[5]何昭丽,孙慧,张振龙.中国入境旅游发展效率及其影响因素研究[J].干旱区地理,2017(6):1282-1289.
[6]李亮,赵磊.中国旅游发展效率及其影响因素的实证研究--基于随机前沿分析方法(SFA)[J].经济管理,2013(2):124-134.
[7]Assaf A G.Benchmarking the Asia Pacific tourism industry:A Bayesian combination of DEA and stochastic frontier[J].Tourism Management,2012,33(5):1122-1127.
[8]Tsaur S H.The operating efficiency of inbound tourist hotels in Taiwan[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research,2000,6(1):29-37.
[9]Liu Y D.Profitability measurement of UK theme parks:An aggregate approach[J].Inbound Journal of Tourism Research,2008,10(3):283-288.
[10]Barros C P.Evaluating the efficiency of a small hotel chain with a Malmquist productivity index[J].International Journal of Tourism Research,2005,7(3):173-184.
[11]Ng C K,Seabright P.Competition,privatization and productive efficiency:Evidence from the airline industry[J].The Economic Journal,2001,111(143):591-619.
[12]李瑞,郭谦,贺跻,等.环渤海地区城市旅游业发展效率时空特征及其演化阶段--以三大城市群为例[J].地理科学进展,2014(6):773-785.
[13]朱磊,胡静,周葆华,等.中国省域森林公园旅游发展效率测度及其时空格局演化[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017(12):2003-2011.
[14]马晓龙,保继刚.基于DEA的中国国家级风景名胜区使用效率评价[J].地理研究,2009(3):838-848.
[15]陈浩,陆林,郑嬗婷.珠江三角洲城市群旅游空间格局演化[J].地理学报,2011(10):1427-1437.
[16]郭向阳,穆学青,明庆忠.旅游发展效率与旅游发展强度的时空耦合演变研究--以长江经济带为例[J].云南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017(6):65-75.
[17]宋鸿,陈晓玲.运用空间自相关分析中国入境旅游增长空间格局[J].世界地理研究,2006(1):99-106.
[18]覃成林,郑云峰,张华.我国区域经济协调发展的趋势及特征分析[J].经济地理,2013(1):9-14.
[19]彭邦文,武友德,曹洪华,等.基于系统耦合的旅游业与新型城镇化协调发展研究--以云南省为例[J].世界地理研究,2016(2):103-114.
[20]张淼丰.知识经济的可持续发展涵义[J].理论导刊,2000(3):24-26.
[21]曹芳东,黄震方,吴江,等.城市旅游发展效率的时空格局演化特征及其驱动机制--以泛长江三角洲地区为例[J].地理研究,2012(8):1431-1444.