用户名: 密码: 验证码:
网络嵌入与风险感知对农户绿色耕作技术采纳行为的影响分析——基于湖北省615个农户的调查数据
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis on the Influence of Network Embeddedness and Risk Perception on Farmers’ Adoption Behavior of Green Agricultural Tillage Technology——Based on the Survey Data of 615 Farmers in Hubei Province
  • 作者:程琳琳 ; 张俊飚 ; 何可
  • 英文作者:CHENG Lin-lin;ZHANG Jun-biao;HE Ke;School of Economics & Management of Hubei University of Technology;College of Economics & Management,Huazhong Agricultural University;Hubei Rural Development Research Center;
  • 关键词:网络嵌入 ; 风险感知 ; 绿色农业 ; 耕作技术 ; 采纳行为
  • 英文关键词:network embeddedness;;risk perception;;green agriculture;;tillage technology;;adoption behavior
  • 中文刊名:CJLY
  • 英文刊名:Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin
  • 机构:湖北工业大学经济管理学院;华中农业大学经济管理学院;湖北农村发展研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-07-15
  • 出版单位:长江流域资源与环境
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.28
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金重点项目(71333006);国家自然科学基金青年项目(71703051);; 教育部哲学社会科学重大项目(15JZD014);教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(16YJC790092,18YJC790184)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CJLY201907023
  • 页数:11
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:42-1320/X
  • 分类号:228-238
摘要
基于社会嵌入理论,利用湖北省615个农户调查数据,运用结构方程模型实证分析网络嵌入与风险感知对农户绿色耕作技术采纳行为的影响路径及其群组差异。研究发现:(1)当前采用绿色耕作技术的农户比例相对较小,其中以秸秆还田覆盖技术采用率相对较高,而深松、有机肥、生物农药等采用率略低;(2)网络嵌入和风险感知对农户绿色耕作技术采用行为具有显著的正向影响,同时风险感知在结构嵌入对农户绿色耕作技术采纳行为的影响中具有中介效应;(3)相比受教育程度与家庭年收入,家庭实际经营土地面积在网络嵌入对农户绿色耕作技术采纳行为影响中的作用更为明显。鉴于此,建议应积极推进农地适度规模经营,并鼓励建立内嵌于当地农技推广站、以种植大户为先导的绿色适用技术推广与讨论网络,确保绿色耕作技术落到田间地头。同时,政府应加强灾害预警与田间学校建设,通过宣传教育与培训指导,强化农户绿色生产意识,引导农户推行绿色生产方式。
        Based on the theory of social embeddedness, using the survey data of 615 households in Hubei province, the structural equation model was used to empirically analyze the influencing path and group differences of network embeddedness and risk perception on the adoption of green tillage technology of farmers. It was found that:(1) the proportion of farmers adopting green tillage technology was relatively small, among which the adoption rate of straw mulching technology was relatively high, while the adoption rate of deep pine, organic fertilizer and biological pesticide was slightly low.(2) Network embeddedness and risk perception have significant positive effects on farmers' green tillage technology adoption behavior, and risk perception has mediating effects on the influence of structural embeddedness on farmers' green tillage technology adoption behavior.(3) Compared with education level and family annual income of famers', the actual land area operated by the family has a more obvious effect on the influence of network embeddedness on the adoption of green tillage technology of farmers. In view of this, it is suggested to actively promote the moderate scale operation of agricultural land, and encourage the establishment of green applicable technology promotion and discussion network embedded in local agricultural technology promotion stations, with big farmers as the forerunner, so as to ensure the green tillage technology to land. At the same time, the government should strengthen disaster warning and construction of field schools, strengthen farmers' awareness of green production by publicizing education and training guidance, and guide farmers to promote green production mode.
引文
[1] GIOVANNI T,SERENA D S,MAUIZIA S,et al.Conservation tillage mitigates the negative effect of landscape simplification on biological control[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2016,53(1):233-241.
    [2] ANGELA T,SONIA G M,MARIELA N,et al.N2O and CH4 emissions from a fallow-wheat rotation with low N input in conservation and conventional tillage under a mediterranean agroecosystem[J].Science of the Total Environment,2015,508:85-94.
    [3] 李卫,薛彩霞,姚顺波,等.农户保护性耕作采用行为及其影响因素:基于黄土高原476户农户的分析[J].中国农村经济,2017(1):44-57.LI W,XUE C X,YAO S B,et al.The adoption behavior of households’ conservation tillage technology:An empirical analysis based on data collected from 476 households on the Loess Plateau[J].China Rural Economy,2017(1):44-57.
    [4] RICO H,LIU J.Risk assessment within agricultural production:Soil conservation strategies and its environmental and economic aspects:A case study for Bavaria[J].International Journal of Agricultural Resources,Governance and Ecology,2017,13(1):1-20.
    [5] 胡立峰,李洪文,高焕文.保护性耕作对温室效应的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(5):308-312.HU L F,LI H W,GAO H W.Influence of conservation tillage on greenhouse effect[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2009,25(5):308-312.
    [6] TAMER E S,YIGEZU A Y,AMIN M,et al.Does zero tillage improve the livelihoods of smaller hole cropping farmers[J].Journal of Agricultural Economics,2016,67(1):154-172.
    [7] 蔡荣,蔡书凯.保护性耕作技术采用及对作物单产影响的实证分析——基于安徽省水稻种植户的调查数据[J].资源科学,2012,34(9):1705-1711.CAI R,CAI S K.The adoption of conservation agricultural technology and the impact on crop yields--Based on rice farmers in Anhui Province[J].Resources Science,2012,34(9):1705-1711.
    [8] 喻永红,韩洪云.农民健康危害认知与保护性耕作措施采用[J].农业技术经济,2012(2):54-62.YU Y H,HAN H Y.Farmers’ health hazard cognition and the adoption of conservation tillage measures--An empirical analysis of the adoption behavior of rice farmers’ IPM in Hubei province[J].Journal of Agrotechnical Economics,2012(2):54-62.
    [9] HAGGBLADE S,TEMBO G.Development,diffusion and impact of conservation farming in Zambia[R].Lusaka:IFPRI and FSRP-MSU,2003.
    [10] 王金霞,张丽娟,黄季焜,等.黄河流域保护性耕作技术的采用:影响因素的实证研究[J].资源科学,2009,31(4):641-647.WANG J X,ZHANG L J,HUANG J K,et al.Adoption of conservation tillage techniques in the Yellow River Basin:An empirical study of influencing factors[J].Resource Science,2009,31(4):641-647.
    [11] 童洪志,刘伟.政策组合对农户保护性耕作技术采纳行为的影响机制研究[J].软科学,2018,32(5):18-23.TONG H Z,LIU W.Influence mechanism of policy mix on farmers’ adoption behavior of protective cultivation technology[J].Soft Science,2018,32(5):18-23.
    [12] GENIUS M,KOUNDOURI P,NAUGES C,et al.Information transmission in irrigation technology adaption and diffusion:Social learning,extension services and spatial effects[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2014,96(1):328-344.
    [13] 王格玲,陆迁.社会网络影响农户技术采用的路径研究——以民勤节水灌溉为例[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,30(5):83-91.WANG G L,LU Q.Study on the influence path of farmers’ adoption of technology by social network[J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition),2016,30(5):83-91.
    [14] FOSTER A D,ROSENZWEIG M R.Learning by doing and learning from others:Human capital and technical change in agriculture[J].Journal of Political Economy,1995,103(6):1176-1209.
    [15] UZZI.Social structure and competition in interfirm network:The paradox of embeddedness[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42(1):35-67.
    [16] 林南.社会资本:关于社会结构与行动的理论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2005.LIN N.Social capital:A theory of social structure and action[M].Shanghai:Shanghai People’s Publishing House,2005.
    [17] 郑阳阳,罗建利,李佳.技术来源、社会嵌入于农业技术推广绩效——基于8家合作社的案例研究[J].中国科技论坛,2017(8):141-151.ZHENG Y Y,LUO J L,LI J.Technology sources,social embeddedness and agricultural technology promotion performance:A multiple case studies based on eight cooperatives[J].Forum on Science and Technology in China,2017(8):141-151.
    [18] 黄中伟,王宇露.关于经济行为的社会嵌入理论研究述评[J].外国经济与管理,2007,29(12):1-8.HUANG Z W,WANG Y L.Review on economic behavior using social embeddedness theory[J].Foreign Economics and Management,2007,29(12):1-8.
    [19] GRANOVETTER M.The strength of weak ties[J].American Journal of Sociology,1973,78(6):1360-1380.
    [20] GULATI R.Does familiarity breed trust?The implication of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances[J].Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(1):85-112.
    [21] 何可,张俊飚,张露,等.人际信任、制度信任与农民环境治理参与意愿——以农业废弃物资源化为例[J].管理世界,2015(5):75-88.HE K,ZHANG J B,ZHANG L,et al.Interpersonal trust,institutional trust and farmers’ willingness to participate in environmental governance:Take agricultural waste resources as an example[J].Management World,2015(5):75-88.
    [22] 吴玉锋,吴中宇.村域社会资本、互动与新农保参保行为研究[J].人口与经济,2011(2):62-68.WU Y F,WU Z Y.An research on the social capital,interactions in village region and the behavior of participation in the new rural insurance system[J].Population and Economics,2011(2):62-68.
    [23] NAHAPIET J,GHOSHAL S.Social capital,intellectual capital,and the organizational advantage[J].Knowledge & Social Capital,2000,23(2):119-157.
    [24] BAUCER R.Consumer behavior as risk taking:Dynamic marking for a changing world[C].Proceedings of the 43th Conference of the American Marketing Association,1964:389-398.
    [25] 黄杰,朱正威,赵巍.风险感知、应对策略与冲突升级——一个群体性事件发生机理的解释框架与运用[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2015,57(1):134-143.HUANG J,ZHU Z W,ZHAO W.Risk perception,coping strategies and conflict escalation:An explanatory framework for the mechanism of mass incidents and its application[J].Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition),2015,57(1):134-143.
    [26] COX D F.Risk taking and information handing in consumer behavior[M].Boston:Harvard University Press,1967:82-108.
    [27] DASH N,GLADWIN H.Evacuation decision making and behavioral responses:Individual and household[J].Natural Hazards Review,2007,8(3):69-77.
    [28] 李华强,范春梅,贾建民,等.突发性灾害中的公众风险感知与应急管理——以512汶川地震为例[J].管理世界,2009(6):52-60.LI H Q,FAN C M,JIA J M,et al.The public perception of risks and the management of emergency measures taken during unexpected calamities[J].Management World,2009(6):52-60.
    [29] 肖建英,谭术魁,程明华.保护性耕作的农户响应意愿实证研究[J].中国土地科学,2012,26(12):57-63.XIAO J Y,TAN S K,CHENG M H.Farmers’ attitudes responding to Arable land conservation measures[J].China Land Sciences,2012,26(12):57-63.
    [30] 王振华,李明文,王昱,等.技术示范、预期风险降低与种粮大户保护性耕作技术行为决策[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(8):182-187WANG Z H,LI M W,WANG Y,et al.Technology demonstration,expected risk reduction and large crop-land owners’ behavior decision on the conservation tillage technology[J].Journal of China Agricultural University,2017,22(8):182-187.
    [31] 余威震,罗小锋,李容容,等.绿色认知视角下农户绿色技术采纳意愿与行为悖离研究[J].资源科学,2017,39(8):1573-1583.YU W Z,LUO X F,LI R R,et al.The paradox between farmer willingness and their adoption of green technology from the perspective of green cognition[J].Resources Science,2017,39(8):1573-1583.
    [32] 侯博,应瑞瑶.分散农户低碳生产行为决策研究——基于TPB和SEM的实证分析[J].农业技术经济,2015(2):4-13.HOU B,YING R Y.Study on the decision-making of decentralized farmers’ low-carbon production behavior:Empirical analysis based on TPB and SEM[J].Journal of Agrotechnical Economics,2015(2):4-13.
    [33] 张郁,刘耀东.养殖户环境风险感知影响因素的实证研究——基于湖北省280个规模养猪户的调研[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(6):168-176.ZHANG Y,LIU Y D.Empirical study on the influencing factors of pig farmers’ environmental risk perception:Based on the survey of 280 scale pig farmers in Hubei province[J].Journal of China Agricultural University,2017,22(6):168-176.
    [34] 巩前文,穆向丽,田志宏.农户过量施肥风险认知及规避能力的影响因素分析——基于江汉平原284个农户的问卷调查[J].中国农村经济,2010(10):66-76.GONG Q W,MU X L,TIAN Z H.Analysis on the factors influencing risk cognition and avoidance ability of overfertilization:Based on the investigation of 284 farmers in Jianghan plain[J].China Rural Economy,2010(10):66-76.
    [35] 王文彬.网络社会中城市居民风险感知影响因素研究[J].社会科学战线,2017(1):185-194.WANG W B.Research on the influencing factors of urban residents’ risk perception in network society[J].Social Science Front,2017(1):185-194.
    [36] 郑继兴.不同情境社会网络对农业技术创新扩散绩效影响的比较研究[J].科技管理研究,2015(2):171-176.ZHENG J X.Comparative research on the performance influence of social network on the diffusion of technological innovation performance in agriculture under different situations:Based on the social network analysis of two villages[J].Science and Technology Management Research,2015(2):171-176.
    [37] 廖列法,王刊良.网络信息不对称性、嵌入性与组织学习绩效研究[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(2):174-182.LIAO L F,WANG K L.Effect of information asymmetry and embeddedness on organizational learning[J].Chinese Journal of Management Science,2011,19(2):174-182.
    [38] 吴明隆.结构方程模型-AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2008.WU M L.Structural equation modeling-Operation and application of AMOS[M].Chongqing:Chongqing University Press,2008.
    [39] 黄炎忠,罗小锋,李容容,等.农户认知、外部环境与绿色农业生产意愿——基于湖北省632个农户调研数据[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(3):680-687.HUANG Y Z,LUO X F,LI R R,et al.Farmer cognition,external environment and willingness of green agriculture production:Based on the survey data of 632 farmers in Hubei province[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2018,27(3):680-687.
    [40] 张桂颖,吕东辉.乡村社会嵌入与农户农地流转行为——基于吉林省936户农户调查数据的实证分析[J].农业技术经济,2017(8):57-66.ZHANG G Y,LV D H.Rural social embeddedness and farmers’ land transfer behavior:Empirical analysis based on data of 476 farmers in Jilin province[J].Journal of Agrotechnical Economics,2017(8):57-66.
    [41] 杨红娟,徐梦菲.少数民族农户低碳生产行为影响因素分析[J].经济问题,2015(6):90-94.YANG H J,XU M F.The analysis of influencing factors o low-carbon production behavior of minority farmers minority people[J].On Economic Problems,2015(6):90-94.
    [42] 喻登科,周荣.农村社会网络的情景化特征及情景下的农户间知识共享机制研究[J].农业图书情报学刊,2018,30(2):43-50.YU D K,ZHOU R.The contextual features of rural social networks and farmer to famer knowledge sharing mechanism within the contexts[J].Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture,2018,30(2):43-50.
    [43] 王宏州.农民风险偏好与其适应气候风险的投资行为研究[D].中国科学院大学,2016.WANG H Z.Research on Farmers’ risk preference and their investment behavior to adapt to climate risk[D].University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2016.
    [44] 吴雪莲,张俊飚,丰军辉.农户绿色技术认知影响因素及其层级结构分解[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017(5):36-45.WU X L,ZHANG J B,FENG J H.Research on factors influencing farmers’ cognition of green agricultural technologies and the stratification:Based on Probit-ISM model[J].Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition),2017(5):36-45.
    (1)实际操作过程中,本次调查内容同样涉及到秸秆覆盖还田技术,由于被调查地区多为机械作业,且农户受到当地政府等强制性要求,秸秆还田普及率较高.据本次调查数据显示,选择农户秸秆还田技术使用频率在“有时”“经常”和“总是”的农户占到近70%.因此,考虑到研究目的,结合实际调查状况,选择从有机肥、绿色农药以及深耕等技术进行考察.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700