贫困户反贫措施的响应行为研究——基于凤凰县贫困户调查数据
|
摘要
2018～2020年,我国发展进入全面建成小康社会的决战决胜阶段,减贫事业也进入了脱贫攻坚时期。文章基于湖南省凤凰县筸子坪镇、沱江镇、两林乡三个乡(镇)511户贫困户的调查数据,运用Logistic分析方法剖析贫困户响应各种反贫措施的主要影响因素。分析表明:决策主体、实施成本、实施难易、家庭经济状况是影响贫困户响应反贫措施行为的主要因素;同时,贫困户在响应反贫措施的时候容易受个人主观能动性和自身局限性制约,最终导致贫困户的响应结果偏离理性的轨道。但大多数贫困户对反贫措施的响应是积极的。
From 2018 to 2020,China's development has entered the decisive stage of building a well-off society in an all-round way,and the cause of poverty reduction has also entered a period of getting rid of poverty and tackling key problems.Based on the survey data of 511 poor households in three townships(towns) of Fenghuang County,Hunan Province,this paper analyzes the main factors influencing the response of poor households to various anti-poverty measures by means of Logistic analysis.The analysis shows that the main factors affecting the poor households' response to anti-poverty measures are the main decision makers,the cost of implementation,the difficulty of implementation and the family economic situation.Poor households in response to anti-poverty measures are subject to individual subjectivity and their own limitations,and ultimately cause poor households responsive results to deviate from the rational track.But most poor households have responded positively to anti-poverty measures.
From 2018 to 2020,China's development has entered the decisive stage of building a well-off society in an all-round way,and the cause of poverty reduction has also entered a period of getting rid of poverty and tackling key problems.Based on the survey data of 511 poor households in three townships(towns) of Fenghuang County,Hunan Province,this paper analyzes the main factors influencing the response of poor households to various anti-poverty measures by means of Logistic analysis.The analysis shows that the main factors affecting the poor households' response to anti-poverty measures are the main decision makers,the cost of implementation,the difficulty of implementation and the family economic situation.Poor households in response to anti-poverty measures are subject to individual subjectivity and their own limitations,and ultimately cause poor households responsive results to deviate from the rational track.But most poor households have responded positively to anti-poverty measures.
引文
[1]左停.精准扶贫战略的多层面解读[J].国家治理,2015(36):16-21.
[2]陆汉文.我国扶贫形势的结构性变化与治理体系创新[J].中共党史研究,2015(12):12-15.
[3]顾仲阳.精准扶贫,不撒胡椒面[J].农村农业农民(下半月),2014(3):6-7.
[4]吴雄周,丁建军.精准扶贫:单维瞄准向多维瞄准的嬗变——兼析湘西州十八洞村扶贫调查[J].湖南社会科学,2015(6):162-166.
[5](美)罗伯特·西蒙.现代决策理论的基石[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社,1989:18-19.
[6](俄)蔡雅诺夫.农民经济组织[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1996:29-31.
[7]苏桂武,马宗晋.汶川地震灾区民众认知与响应地震灾害的特点及其减灾宣教意义[J].地震地质,2008,30(4):877-894.
[8](美)舒尔茨.改造传统农业[M].北京:商务印书馆,2010:23-24.
[9]徐加玉.农村基层精准扶贫实践问题分析——基于云南邓镇的调查[J].中国延安干部学院学报,2016,9(3):130-136.
[10]孙璐.扶贫项目绩效评估研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2015.
[11]陈卫洪,谢晓英.扶贫资金投入对贫困户家庭收入的影响分——基于贵州省1990-2010年扶贫数据的实证检验[J].农业技术经济,2013(4):35-42.
[12]刘牧.当代中国农村扶贫开发战略研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2016.
[13]田伟.连片特困区乡村多维贫困及综合治理研究——以湘西州永顺县高坪乡为例[J].吉首大学,2014(12):31-33.
[14]严奉宪,柳青,熊延虹.有限理性下贫困户减灾措施响应分析——基于湖北省贫困户调查数据[J].农业技术经济,2012(3):37-46.
[2]陆汉文.我国扶贫形势的结构性变化与治理体系创新[J].中共党史研究,2015(12):12-15.
[3]顾仲阳.精准扶贫,不撒胡椒面[J].农村农业农民(下半月),2014(3):6-7.
[4]吴雄周,丁建军.精准扶贫:单维瞄准向多维瞄准的嬗变——兼析湘西州十八洞村扶贫调查[J].湖南社会科学,2015(6):162-166.
[5](美)罗伯特·西蒙.现代决策理论的基石[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社,1989:18-19.
[6](俄)蔡雅诺夫.农民经济组织[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1996:29-31.
[7]苏桂武,马宗晋.汶川地震灾区民众认知与响应地震灾害的特点及其减灾宣教意义[J].地震地质,2008,30(4):877-894.
[8](美)舒尔茨.改造传统农业[M].北京:商务印书馆,2010:23-24.
[9]徐加玉.农村基层精准扶贫实践问题分析——基于云南邓镇的调查[J].中国延安干部学院学报,2016,9(3):130-136.
[10]孙璐.扶贫项目绩效评估研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2015.
[11]陈卫洪,谢晓英.扶贫资金投入对贫困户家庭收入的影响分——基于贵州省1990-2010年扶贫数据的实证检验[J].农业技术经济,2013(4):35-42.
[12]刘牧.当代中国农村扶贫开发战略研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2016.
[13]田伟.连片特困区乡村多维贫困及综合治理研究——以湘西州永顺县高坪乡为例[J].吉首大学,2014(12):31-33.
[14]严奉宪,柳青,熊延虹.有限理性下贫困户减灾措施响应分析——基于湖北省贫困户调查数据[J].农业技术经济,2012(3):37-46.