用户名: 密码: 验证码:
Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: prospective comparison of US, CT and MR imaging
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Michele Di Martino (1)
    Gianmaria De Filippis (1)
    Adriano De Santis (2)
    Daniel Geiger (1)
    Maurizio Del Monte (1)
    Concetta Valentina Lombardo (1)
    Massimo Rossi (3)
    Stefano Ginanni Corradini (2)
    Gianluca Mennini (3)
    Carlo Catalano (1)
  • 关键词:Hepatocellular carcinoma ; Ultrasound ; Multidetector computed tomography ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Liver specific contrast agent
  • 刊名:European Radiology
  • 出版年:2013
  • 出版时间:April 2013
  • 年:2013
  • 卷:23
  • 期:4
  • 页码:887-896
  • 全文大小:340KB
  • 参考文献:1. Yang JD, Roberts LR (2010) Epidemiology and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Infect Dis Clin North Am 24:899-19 CrossRef
    2. Gomaa AI, Khan SA, Toledano MB, Waked I, Taylor-Robinson SD (2008) Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors and pathogenesis. World J Gastroenterol 14:4300-308 CrossRef
    3. Gambarin-Gelwan M, David CD, Shapiro R et al (2000) Sensitivity of commonly available screening test in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1535-538 CrossRef
    4. Reinhold C, Hammers L, Taylor CR et al (1995) Characterization of focal hepatic lesions with Duplex sonogrphy: findings in 198 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:1131-135 CrossRef
    5. Noguchi Y, Murakami T, Kim T et al (2003) Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of dynamic MR imaging with dynamic double arterial phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:455-60 CrossRef
    6. Kim YK, Kim CS, Chung GH et al (2006) Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR and 16-MDCT for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:149-57 CrossRef
    7. Peterson MS, Baron RL, Marsh JW, Oliver JH III, Confer SR, Hunt LE (2000) Pretransplantation Surveillance for possible hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: epidemiology and CT-based tumor detection rate in 430 cases with surgical pathologic correlation. Radiology 217:743-49
    8. Sangiovanni A, Manini MA, Iavarone M et al (2010) The diagnostic and economic impact of contrast imaging techniques in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Gut 59:638-44 CrossRef
    9. Teefey SA, Hildeboldt CC, Dehdashti F et al (2003) Detection of primary hepatic malignancy in liver transplant candidates: prospective comparison of CT, MR imaging, US, PET. Radiology 226:533-42 CrossRef
    10. Libbrecht L, Bielen D, Verslype C et al (2002) Focal lesions in cirrhotic explant livers: pathological evaluation and accuracy of pretransplantation imaging examinations. Liver Transpl 8:749-61 CrossRef
    11. Freeman RB, Mithoefer A, Ruthazer R et al (2006) Optimizing staging for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: a retrospective analysis of the UNOS/OPTN database. Liver Transpl 12:1504-511 CrossRef
    12. Boone JM (2006) Multidetector CT: opportunities, challenges, and concerns associated with scanners with 64 or more detector rows. Radiology 241:334-37 CrossRef
    13. Marin D, Catalano C, De Filippis G et al (2009) Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrosi: added value of coronal multiplanar reformations from isotropix voxel with 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:775-82 CrossRef
    14. D’Onofrio M, Faccioli N, Zamboni G et al (2008) Focal liver lesions in cirrohosis: value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography compared with Doppler ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein levels. Radiol Med 113:978-91
    15. Baron RL, Oliver JH III, Confer S et al (1997) Screening cirrhosis for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with helical contrast CT: specificity. Radiology 2005:143
    16. Bruix J, Scherman M, Llovet JM et al (2001) Clinical managment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the barcellona-2000 EASL conference. Europe Assosation for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 35:421-30 CrossRef
    17. Marin D, Di Martino M, Guerrisi A et al (2009) Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: qualitative comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging and multiphasic 64-section CT. Radiology 251:1- CrossRef
    18. Kim JI, Lee MJ, Choi JY et al (2008) The value of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced delayed phase MR imaging for characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma nodules in the cirrhotic liver. Invest Radiol 43:202-10 CrossRef
    19. Kim YK, Kim SC, Lee YH et al (2004) Comaprison of superparamgnetic Iron Oxide-Enhanced and gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI for detection of small hepatocellular carcinomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1217-223 CrossRef
    20. Hammerstingl R, Huppertz A, Breuer J et al (2008) Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxedic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MRI and spiral CT for a therapeutic strategy: comparison with intraopeartive and histological findings in focal lilver lesions. Eur Radiol 18:457-67 CrossRef
    21. Di Martino M, Marin D, Guerrisi G et al (2010) Intraindividual comparison of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging and 64-section multidetector CT in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Radiology 256:806-16 CrossRef
    22. Ebara M, Hatano R, Fukuda H et al (1998) Natural course of small hepatocellular carcinoma with underlying cirrhosis. A study of 30 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 45:1214-220
    23. International Working Party (1995) Terminology of nodular hepatocellular lesions. Hepatology 22:983-93
    24. Harvey CJ, Albrecht T (2001) Ultrasound of focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol 11:1578-593 CrossRef
    25. Bruix J, Scherman M (2005) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 42:1208-236 CrossRef
    26. Forner A, Vilana R, Ayuso C et al (2008) Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: prospective validation of non invasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 47:97-04 CrossRef
    27. Chakraborty DP (2006) Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method. Acad Radiol 13:1187-193 CrossRef
    28. Schwnke C, Busse R (2007) Analysis of differences in proportions from clustered data with multiple measurements in disgnostic studies. Methods Inf Med 46:548-52
    29. Bruix J, Scherman M (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53:1020-022 CrossRef
    30. Vogl TJ, Stupavsky A, Pegios W et al (1997) Hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of dynamic and static gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging and histopatologic correlation. Radiology 205:721-28
    31. Grazioli L, Morana G, Caudana R et al (2000) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Correlation between gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and pathologic findings. Invest Radiol 35:25-4 CrossRef
    32. Morana G, Grazioli L, Kirchin MA et al (2011) Solid hypervascular liver lesions: accurate identification of true benign lesions on enhanced dynamic and hepatobiliary phase magnetic resonance imaging after gadobenate dimeglumine administration. Invest Radiol 46:225-39 CrossRef
    33. Choi B, Kim T, Han J et al (2000) Vascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment with contrast-enhanced scond harmonic versus color Doppler ultrasound. Radiology 214:167-72
    34. Strobel D, Kleinecke C, H?nsler J et al (2005) Contrast-enhanced sonography for the characterisation of hepatocellular carcinomas—correlation with histological differentiation. Ultraschall Med 26:270-76 CrossRef
    35. D?nil? M, Sporea I, Sirli R, Popescu A, Sendroiu M, Martie A (2010) The role of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the assessment of liver nodules in patients with cirrhosis. Med Ultrason 12:145-49
    36. Xu PJ, Yan FH, Wang JH, Shan Y, Ji Y, Chen CZ (2010) Contribution of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:506-12 CrossRef
    37. Bartolozzi C, Battaglia V, Bozzi E (2011) Hepatocellular nodules in liver cirrhosis: contrast enhanced MR. Abdom Imaging 36:290-99 CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Michele Di Martino (1)
    Gianmaria De Filippis (1)
    Adriano De Santis (2)
    Daniel Geiger (1)
    Maurizio Del Monte (1)
    Concetta Valentina Lombardo (1)
    Massimo Rossi (3)
    Stefano Ginanni Corradini (2)
    Gianluca Mennini (3)
    Carlo Catalano (1)

    1. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, University of Rome “Sapienza- Viale Regina Elena 324, Rome, 00161, Italy
    2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Rome “Sapienza- Viale Regina Elena 324, Rome, 00161, Italy
    3. Department of General Surgery, Division of Organ Transplantation, University of Rome “Sapienza- Viale Regina Elena 324, Rome, 00161, Italy
  • ISSN:1432-1084
文摘
Objectives To prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cirrhotic patients who were candidates for liver transplantation. Methods One hundred and forty consecutive patients with 163 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nodules underwent US, MRI and MDCT. Diagnosis of HCC was based on pathological findings or substantial growth at 12-month follow-up. Four different image datasets were evaluated: US, MDCT, MRI unenhanced and dynamic phases, MRI unenhanced dynamic and hepatobiliary phase. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, with corresponding 95?% confidence intervals, were determined. Statistical analysis was performed for all lesions and for three lesion subgroups (<1?cm, 1-2?cm, >2?cm). Results Significantly higher diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and NPV was achieved on dynamic + hepatobiliary phase MRI compared with US, MDCT and dynamic phase MRI alone. The specificity and PPV of US was significantly lower than that of MDCT, dynamic phase MRI and dynamic + hepatobiliary phase MRI. Similar results were obtained for all sub-group analyses, with particular benefit for the diagnosis of smaller lesions between 1 and 2?cm. Conclusions Dynamic + hepatobiliary phase MRI improved detection and characterisation of HCC in cirrhotic patients. The greatest benefit is for diagnosing lesions between 1 and 2?cm. Key Points -US, CT and MRI can all identify HCC in cirrhotic patients -US has good sensitivity but suffers from false-positive findings -Dynamic CT and MR have similar diagnostic performance for diagnosing HCC -Dynamic + hepatobiliary phase MRI significantly improves detection and characterisation of HCC -The greatest benefit is for the diagnosis of lesions between 1 and 2?cm

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700