用户名: 密码: 验证码:
Mandatory Integration Measures and Differential Inclusion: The Italian Case
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Paolo Cuttitta
  • 关键词:Integration ; Regular migration ; Discrimination ; Differential inclusion ; Italy
  • 刊名:Journal of International Migration and Integration
  • 出版年:2016
  • 出版时间:February 2016
  • 年:2016
  • 卷:17
  • 期:1
  • 页码:289-302
  • 全文大小:212 KB
  • 参考文献:Alexander, J. C. (2013). Struggling over the mode of incorporation: backlash against multiculturalism in Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(4), 531–556.CrossRef
    Attia, I. (2013). Privilegien sichern, nationale Identität revitalisieren. Journal für Psychologie, 21(1), 1–31.
    Banting, K., & Kymlicka, W. (2013). Is there really a retreat from multiculturalism policies? New evidence from the multiculturalism policy index. Comparative European Politics, 11(5), 577–598.CrossRef
    Brubaker, R. (2001). The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548.CrossRef
    Camera dei Deputati. (2006). Risposta del ministro Giuliano Amato all’interrogazione dell’onorevole Luca Volontè (Iniziative volte all’immediata redazione di una Carta dei Valori). Rome: Camera dei Deputati.
    Cardia, C. (2008). Carta dei valori e multiculturalità alla prova della Costituzione. Stato, chiese e pluralismo confessionale
    Carrera, S. (2006). A Comparison of Integration Programmes in the EU. Trends and Weaknesses (p. 1). Challenge Papers.
    Casas-Cortes, M., Cobarrubias, S., De Genova, N., Garelli, G., Grappi, G., Heller, C., et al. (2014). New keywords: migration and borders. Cultural Studies. doi:10.​1080/​09502386.​2014.​891630 .
    Colaianni, N. (2007). Una ‘carta’ post-costituzionale? Stato, chiese e pluralismo confessionale.
    Colaianni, N. (2009). Alla ricerca di una politica del diritto sui rapporti con l’Islam (Carta dei valori e Dichiarazione di intenti). Stato, chiese e pluralismo confessionale.
    Cuttitta, P. (2007). Segnali di confine. Il controllo dell’immigrazione nel mondo-frontiera. Milan: Mimesis.
    Cuttitta, P. (2013). L’accordo di integrazione come caso di discriminazione istituzionale in Italia. In M. Grasso (Ed.), Razzismi, discriminazioni e confinamenti (pp. 257–273). Rome: Ediesse.
    De Genova, N. (2002). Migrant ‘illegality’ and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 419–447.CrossRef
    De Genova, N. (2013). Spectacles of migrant ‘illegality’: the scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(7), 1180–1198.CrossRef
    De Vries, K. (2012). Integration Requirements in EU Migration Law. EUI Working Paper MWP 20.
    European Migration Network (2012). Ad-Hoc Query on Citizenship Tests. Requested by AT EMN NCP on 27th April 2012. Compilation produced on 28th September 2012. http://​www.​sisekaitse.​ee/​public/​ERV/​ad_​hoc/​muu/​2011/​2012/​EMN_​NCP_​AT_​Ad-Hoc_​Query_​on_​Citizenship_​Tests_​22062012_​open_​compilation.​pdf . Accessed 18 June 2014.
    Ferrari, S. (2008). La carta dei valori della cittadinanza e dell’integrazione. In I. S. M. U. Fondazione (Ed.), Tredicesimo rapporto sulle migrazioni: 2007 (pp. 265–277). Milan: Angeli.
    Groenendijk, K. (2011). Pre-departure integration strategies in the European Union: integration or immigration policy? European Journal of Migration and Law, 13, 1–30.CrossRef
    Hage, G. (2011). Multiculturalism and the ungovernable Muslim. In R. Gayta (Ed.), Essays on Muslims & multiculturalism (pp. 155–186). Melbourne: Text Publishing.
    ICMPD. (2005). Integration agreements and voluntary measures. Vienna: International Centre for Migration Policy Development.
    Jacobs, D., & Rea, A. (2007). The end of national models? Integration courses and citizenship trajectories in Europe. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 9(2), 264–283.
    Joppke, C. (2007). Beyond national models: civic integration policies for immigrants in Western Europe. West European Politics, 30(1), 1–22.CrossRef
    Lentin, A., & Titley, G. (2011). The crises of multiculturalism. Racism in a neoliberal age. London: Zed Books.
    Meer, N., & Modood, T. (2010). The racialisation of Muslims. In S. Sayyid & A. Vakil (Eds.), Thinking through Islamophobia: global perspectives (pp. 69–83). London: Hurst & Company.
    Mezzadra, S., & Neilson, B. (2013). Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRef
    Onasch, E., & Weide, M. (2012). Teaching integration in France and Finland: a comparison of national discourses within civic integration programmes. In H. Vad Jønsson, E. Onasch, S. Pellander, & M. Wickström (Eds.), Migrations and welfare states policies, discourses and institutions (pp. 174–215). Helsinki: Nordic Centre of Excellence NordWel.
    Russo Spena, A., & Carbone, V. (2014). Il dovere di integrarsi. Cittadinanze oltre il logos multiculturalista. Rome: Armando Editore.
    Santoro, E. (2006). La fine della biopolitica e il controllo delle migrazioni: il carcere strumento della dittatura democratica della classe soddisfatta. In P. Cuttitta & F. Vassallo Paleologo (Eds.), Migrazioni, frontiere, diritti (pp. 293–321). Naples: ESI.
    Scevi, P. (2010). Diritto delle migrazioni.Profili penali, civili, amministrativi. Piacenza: La Tribuna.
    Schiffauer, W. (2008). Parallelgesellschaften. Wie viel Wertekonsens braucht unsere Gesellschaft? Für eine kluge Politik der Differenz. Bielefeld: Transcript.
    Schinkel, W. (2013). The imagination of ‘society’ in measurements of immigrant integration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(7), 1142–1161.CrossRef
    Schneider, J., & Crul, M. (2010). New insights into assimilation and integration theory: introduction to the special issue. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(7), 1143–1148.CrossRef
    Shachar, A. (2007). The shifting border of immigration regulation. Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, 3(2), 165–193.
    Taras, R. (2013). ‘Islamophobia never stands still’: race, religion, and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(3), 417–433.CrossRef
    Triadafilopoulos, T. (2011). Illiberal means to liberal ends? Understanding recent immigrant integration policies in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(6), 861–880.CrossRef
    van Houtum, H., & van Naerssen, T. (2002). Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93(2), 125–136.CrossRef
    Vasta, E. (2007). From ethnic minorities to ethnic majority policy: multiculturalism and the shift to assimilationism in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(5), 713–740.CrossRef
    Walters, W. (2002). Mapping Schengenland: denaturalizing the border. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20(5), 561–58.CrossRef
    Walters, W. (2004). Secure borders, safe haven, domopolitics. Citizenship Studies, 8(3), 237–260.CrossRef
    Zorzella, N. (2011). L’accordo di integrazione: ultimo colpo di coda di un governo cattivo? Diritto Immigrazione e Cittadinanza, 13(4), 58–71.
  • 作者单位:Paolo Cuttitta (1)

    1. VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 刊物主题:Migration; Demography; Sociology, general; Population Economics;
  • 出版者:Springer Netherlands
  • ISSN:1874-6365
文摘
Since 2012 migrants arriving regularly in Italy must sign an integration agreement and declare their agreement with a ‘Charter of the values’. Insufficient integration (measured through a point-based system) results in deportation. While the point-based system discriminates against the poor, the less educated and qualified, the subordinate workers, and the nomads, the Charter is inspired by stereotypical and stigmatizing visions of Islam. This paper identifies the cases of discrimination, both legal (freedom of thought, presumption of innocence, principle of non-discrimination, right to an effective remedy, laicism of state) and symbolical, of the integration agreement, and analyses Italian integration measures before the background of the concept of differential inclusion: the incorporation of regular migrants requires them to pass under a symbolic and legal yoke, which increases their hierarchical differentiation. The integration agreement is also analyzed with regard to its relationship with border controls and with the concepts of ‘illegalization’ and ‘deportability’. Keywords Integration Regular migration Discrimination Differential inclusion Italy

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700