The photochromic compounds
trans- and
cis-[Ru(tpy)(Mepic)(dmso)](OSO
2CF
3) (
2 and
3, respectively; tpy is 2,2':6',2' '-terpyridine; Mepic is 6-methyl-2-pyridinecarboxylate; dmso is dimethyl sulfoxide) and
cis-[Ru(tpy)(Brpic)(dmso)](PF
6) (
4; Brpic is 6-bromo-2-pyridinecarboxylate) were prepared and characterized by single-crystal X-raycrystallography, electrochemistry, NMR, IR, and UV-vis spectroscopy. The geometry labels refer to the relationshipbetween the carboxylate oxygen of the picolinate ligand and dmso. Electrochemical studies reveal that only thetrans isomer shows S-to-O isomerization following oxidation of Ru(II) and O-to-S isomerization following reductionof Ru(III). The cis isomers of both complexes feature reversible one-electron Ru(III/II) couples. All complexes undergophototriggered S-to-O isomerization following MLCT (metal-to-ligand charge transfer) excitation with quantum yields(
SO) of 0.79 (
2), 0.0
11 (
3), and 0.014 (
4). The methyl group in
2 promotes isomerization by hindering rotationof the dmso ligand about the Ru-S bond. Computational results support this role for the methyl group. Relativeenergy calculations show that the barrier to rotation is approximately 8 kcal mol
-1. These results suggest thatrotation is an important vibration for isomerization in photochromic ruthenium-dmso complexes.