Process of biodiversity research of Karst areas in China

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Chen Li ; Kangning Xiong ; Guangmei Wu
• 关键词：Biodiversity ; Karst ; Research analysis
• 刊名：Acta Ecologica Sinica
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：August, 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：33
• 期：4
• 页码：192-200
• 全文大小：488 K

文摘

Because the Karst environment is very sensitive to disturbance, once a strong disturbance occurs in a Karst ecosystem it will undergo reverse succession, and both its recovery and restoration might be difficult. So, biodiversity is an important factor in maintaining existing Karst landscapes and also provides the basis for recovery of degraded Karst ecosystems. Karst restoration has become the core issue in research related to environmental changes in Karst areas. With the implementation of the World Heritage List and Rocky Desertification Project in recent years, the number of related research papers has shown rapid growth and Karst has become one of the important topics of new research. This paper uses the CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) and Springer databases as well as the Taylor & Francis UK database as data sources; the result shows: (1) the quantity of Karst related journal articles is on the rise, exceeding 20 articles per year since 2008; (2) Karst related journal articles focus on two major categories, ecology (51) and environmental engineering (41); (3) the literature mainly comprises jointly produced documents, and most are from the core research team of Wang Kelin, Su Weici, Xiong Kangning. Based on statistical results, we comprehensively review two theses and 89 academic papers and use combined data from the internet and correlation analysis to give a scientific overview of recent literature. The result can be seen in three ways. First, 39 papers have been published on mechanisms that maintain biodiversity > 20 papers on the characteristics of diversity > 20 papers on monitoring and evaluation of diversity > 13 papers on Karst restoration and reconstruction of diversity. Second, the research concentrated on three aspects, namely, 16 papers on the characteristics of native biodiversity, 17 on biological mechanisms that maintain biodiversity, and 15 on non-biological mechanisms for maintaining biodiversity. Third, for comparing natural Karst habitats with degraded habitat in two contrasting ecological landscapes, the paper elaborates on dynamic biodiversity research in Karst areas from different perspectives and different fields and scientifically analyses the correlations of literature from these different perspectives. This paper is based on a brief summary of research related to biodiversity in Karst regions, as well as research related to the perspectives of specific geological and geomorphological conditions of Karst regions and clarifies the basic condition of biological diversity in Karst areas. Four problem areas are identified that need to be the subject of future studies. First, research related to genetics, species and ecosystem research needs to be integrated and strengthened and further study of mechanisms related to genetic variation, species in Karst area flora and changes within Karst ecosystems is needed. Second, research on the mechanisms involved in habitat maintenance serves as the basis of the establishment of regional diversity surveys. On this basis, research related to maintaining diversity in light of economic development should be added with discussions on issues such as population variation and the ability of populations to evolve as well as changes in regional biodiversity on both the macro and microlevels. Third, species selection during habitat reconstruction is very subjective. If we want to balance economic development with ecological benefits, we need to study how we can coordinate the relationships among species in the reconstruction area, and maintain stable regional biodiversity. Last, designing a monitoring system is an important basis for status surveys and prediction of future conditions. Monitoring might provide scientific data to help maintain biological diversity in Karst areas.