gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">In recent years, COgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 5.08pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">2 gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">phase transition jet (CPTJ) coal-breaking technology has been reported to increase coal gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">seam permeability. However, the structural evolution egb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">ffffgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">ect of coal subjected to CPTJ technology is unclear, gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">which restricts widespread CPTJ technology application. In this study, a laboratory experimental system and gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">fifigb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">eld technical equipment were developed, and coal-breaking experiments under digb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">ffffgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">erent CPTJ pressure congb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">ditions were conducted. We investigated pore structure changes by combining scanning electron microscopy gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">(SEM) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) to better understand the coal pore structure evolution chargb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">acteristics under digb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">ffffgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">erent CPTJ pressures. Furthermore, an enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM) recovery exgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">periment using CPTJ coal-breaking technology was conducted with the self-developed technical equipment. The gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">results show that notable damage occurs in the coal body ingb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">flflgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">uenced by CPTJ, and the damage area increases gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">with increasing jet pressure. The SEM results revealed that more pores and cracks are produced due to liquid COgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 5.08pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">2 gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">CPTJ, and the porosity and crack size increase with increasing jet pressure. MIP analysis indicates that the pore gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">structure of the breaking coal samples mainly includes macropores, and coal sample macroporosity increases gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">signigb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">fifigb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">cantly with increasing jet pressure. The gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">fifigb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">eld ECBM experiment showed that CPTJ technology can reduce gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">the coalbed methane (CBM) drainage decay coegb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">ffiffiffigb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">cient and increase the CBM extraction pure gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">flflgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">ow rate and gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">recovery egb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">ffiffiffigb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">ciency 8.3gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">–gb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 7.173pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes'">10.4 and 20.4 times, respectively.